6 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	f97b8a4576	Let the account holder edit their own profile details ... The Profile block is headed "Your profile", but the one person on it you could not change was yourself: your name, your birth year, and whether you take lessons yourself were fixed at whatever signup recorded, and correcting any of them meant asking a studio admin. A "Your details" section now opens the page, saved through the same nonce-checked template_redirect post/redirect/get path the child rows use: - Your name, written to display_name and nickname together, for the reason updateChild() does — UserName reads the nickname first, and leaving it behind would put the account's email address back on every screen that names a person. - "I take lessons myself", the positive of us_guardian_only. This makes good on the claim already in bookableStudents() and the feature doc that a guardian-only account can put itself right from the profile page. - Your birth year, held to the same normaliseBirthYear() rule as every other student. The email is shown but not editable: it is the account's user_login as well as its address, so changing it stays a studio-side job. The birth-year field deliberately carries no `required` attribute. It is asked of a student only, and this page loads no JavaScript, so a browser-enforced `required` would leave a guardian who books solely for other people unable to submit the form at all; handleSelf() enforces it against the checkbox instead. Unticking the box does not clear a stored birth year — it says who books, not "forget what is on file". Closes #165 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-30 15:08:05 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	434fe801ba	Ask some registration questions of students only ... Every account-signup question was asked of everybody who registered, on the same terms: "school and grade" had to be put to an adult signing themselves up, and a question a studio needed answered for each student could only be made required by demanding it of everyone. A question now carries an audience — everyone, or only the students someone registers on behalf of — and its own required flag for each side, so optional for you and required for every student you enrol is expressible. Both settings are account-scope only: an offering asks its questions once, about the student being booked, so there is no second audience to differ from, and an offering question mirrors its single "required" into both columns. Every caller reads askedOfSelf()/isRequiredForSelf()/isRequiredForChild() rather than the raw flags, so a students-only question can neither block the account holder nor have an answer filed against them by a crafted post. The family screen, which only ever adds a student, is held to the students' rule. is_required_child arrives from dbDelta defaulting to 0, which would quietly stop every existing required question being required of the students a guardian registers — the case it most likely existed for. A one-time backfill copies is_required across, guarded by its own option so a question later made optional for students stays that way. Closes #163 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-30 13:51:52 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	1d2f95d388	Require a name and birth year for every student ... Both fields are marked in their labels the same way a required registration question is, and enforced on the server whichever form they arrive from: GuardianService::createChild() and updateChild() now refuse a blank name or an unusable birth year, and the signup form checks the same rule up front, before it creates a single user, so a bad block never leaves a half-registered family behind. normaliseBirthYear() became public and static so both paths share one definition of what a usable year is. The signup form cannot lean on the browser here. Its child blocks are hidden until the parent/guardian box is ticked, and a `required` field inside a hidden container makes the whole form unsubmittable with no control the user can reach to fix — the same trap the guardian's own question panel already sidesteps by disabling rather than hiding. So register.js puts `required` on and takes it off along with the block itself, and the server is what makes the rule hold with JavaScript off. The profile screen has no such problem: its forms are always visible, so the attribute is static there. One behaviour change beyond the requirement: a child block with anything typed into it is now reported back instead of dropped. Previously any block without a name was silently discarded, which would now mean losing a birth year the guardian had filled in. A wholly untouched spare block — the one the form always renders for "add another" — is still ignored. Verified the required-toggling in a headless browser: unticked submits, ticked blocks an empty block, a cloned block inherits the requirement, and re-unticking leaves nothing behind to block a non-guardian signup. Closes #148 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 21:00:45 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	7e2bba79fe	Collect a birth year instead of a full date of birth ... Signup and the profile page now ask for a four-digit year between 1900 and the current year. Anything else — a short year, a full date, a year in the future — is discarded rather than stored, so a typo cannot leave a nonsense age on the record. The year lives in a new us_birth_year user meta rather than reusing us_date_of_birth, which would have left one key holding two formats. The old key is not migrated in bulk. Instead GuardianService handles it in two halves: birthYear() falls back to the year of the old date when the new key is absent, so a student added before this change still shows one, and setBirthYear() deletes the old date on every save. That deletion is what makes the fallback safe rather than merely tidy. Without it, clearing the birth year on a student who predates the change would leave the old date behind for the fallback to read straight back, and the year could never be cleared at all. Stored in user meta, so no Schema.php change and no USC_VERSION bump. Closes #147 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 20:47:56 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	76caf178f0	Say "student" and "profile" in the UI, not "child" and "family" ... Sweep the translatable strings across the frontend templates, the admin screens, the editor previews and the block inserter entry. Nothing else moves: the database columns, request parameters, form field names, CSS classes, the us_family shortcode and the us-scheduler/family block name are contracts with existing installs and with post content people have already saved, so renaming them would break sites for no user-visible gain. Two strings are reworded rather than swapped, because the direct substitution reads wrong: - The students list said "Child of Jane" and now says "Managed by Jane". "Student of Jane" would read as a teacher's pupil, which is exactly the wrong idea in a music studio. - A managed account is now "a managed student account" rather than "a student account", which would not distinguish it from the account holder. The guardian feature doc gains a short section on the split, so the next person to work on it does not read the mismatch as drift and "fix" it. Closes #144 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 20:34:55 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	b772e1811e	Let parents register once and book for their children ... A parent registers once and manages lessons for one or more children, who need no login of their own. A child is a real wp_users row with the student role but no usable login — so student_id keeps meaning "a WordPress user" on every table, and booking, credits, policies and enrolments work unchanged. A us_guardians link table maps guardian to child. The signup form gains a parent/guardian tick that reveals a block per child, with the account-signup questions asked per child rather than per guardian — they describe the student, not the account holder. Signup policies are recorded once per child with the guardian as the acceptor, which is the record that actually means something. A family that half-creates is rolled back entirely rather than leaving a guardian who cannot re-register. The booking and enrolment forms gain a "Who is this for?" picker listing children first, so the default selection is never the parent — booking for the wrong child is correctable, quietly billing a parent for their kid's lesson is not. POST /bookings and POST /enrollments take an optional student_id honoured only for that child's guardian; anything else is a 403. That check is the authorisation boundary of the feature. Payments and credits gain a payer: the charge names the child it was for and the guardian who owes it, so per-child reporting is unchanged while notices, receipts and the payment step reach the parent. Credit is held by the payer, so one child's cancellation can settle a sibling's charge, and the daily billing scan sends a guardian one notice covering every child. Closes #132 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 16:07:52 -03:00