21 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	cb347ffca0	Demo follow-ups: editable policy name, one-page signup, group classes in upcoming lessons, deletion cleanup ... Five items from the latest demo pass: - A policy's title can be edited from the Policies screen. Only the title moves; the slug is what the gates resolve policies by, so a rename can never detach a policy from acceptances already recorded against it. - Signup is one page again. The studio's registration questions move from a second step behind "Next" onto the main form, in an "About you" panel above the students being added, and that panel also asks an adult student for their birth year (the same us_birth_year meta a child's uses). register.js disables and hides the whole panel for a pure guardian, since the questions describe a student. - The password is re-scored on submit, not only as it is typed. zxcvbn's dictionary arrives after page load, so a password typed straight away was never scored at all and the first the student heard of it was the server rejecting the whole form. - Group-class sessions appear alongside lessons wherever upcoming lessons are listed: the [us_scheduler] panel (students and instructors) and the admin student detail page. GroupClass\SessionSchedule derives them from Offering::sessionWindows(), the same derivation the billing scan uses. They carry kind = 'group_class' and no Cancel action - a session is one date in a term, not a booked slot. - Deleting a user releases what the account was holding: each upcoming lesson is cancelled, its slot freed for rebooking, its pending payment voided, and active class enrolments cancelled. Past lessons and paid history are left alone. Tests: composer test (851), composer lint, composer cs all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-30 11:45:04 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	69179b75c9	Ask the account holder the studio's questions when they are a student too ... Under "both" the questions were collected per student only, so someone registering themselves alongside their children was never asked their own instrument, level or anything else — despite being able to book lessons. The account-scope questions describe a student, and under "both" the account holder is one. Their answers are recorded against their own user id, not shared with a child's, and recorded after the children so a rollback that deletes the account cannot leave answers pointing at a user that no longer exists. A pure guardian is unchanged: they are not a student, so anything posted for them is still ignored. Validation became two passes rather than one so the message can say whose answers are missing — with one pass, "both" had to blame "each student" for the account holder's own blank field. In the form, the two questions turn out to be independent: whether student blocks are in play, and whether the account holder answers for themselves. "Both" is the case that needs its own answer to each, so sync() now tracks them separately, and step two comes back into play under "both". Verified in a headless browser: 21 checks across all three choices, now including that "both" enables the account holder's own question panel and offers Next rather than the early submit. Closes #146 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 23:15:47 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	4e5382e259	Ask who the signup is for as a three-way choice ... Replaces the single "I'm registering as a parent or guardian" tick with "Just myself" / "On behalf of one or more students" / "Both". Radios, not checkboxes as the feedback put it: the three answers are mutually exclusive, and "both" only means anything as a third choice alongside the other two. The tick could only ever say whether there were children to add. It could not say whether the account holder was a student, so bookableStudents() always offered them their own name and any guardian could book themselves a lesson nobody meant to sell. "On behalf of" now records us_guardian_only and leaves them out of the picker. That flag is stored as the negative on purpose. Every account predating this choice is a bookable student, and absence has to keep meaning exactly that, or the picker would quietly stop offering people themselves on upgrade. setGuardianOnly() clears the key rather than writing 0, so "not set" stays the single spelling of "yes, a student". A guardian-only account with nobody linked to it is still offered itself — an empty picker is no way to book at all, and they can put the account right from the profile page. An unrecognised or absent value reads as "just myself": the choice that collects the least and grants the least. A missing radio must never be taken as "register these children". Bumps to 1.4.0. The account holder's own questions stay out of play whenever students are being added, "both" included — asking them there is #146. Verified the form in a headless browser across all three choices: which blocks show, which fields carry `required`, whether the account holder's question panel is disabled, which submit is offered, and that switching back to "just myself" leaves no hidden required field blocking submit. Closes #145 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 23:09:47 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	04cba9702c	Fix main: two signup fixtures use a now-rejected password ... #154 and #155 each passed on their own branch and broke on landing together. #154 added two guardian-signup tests using 'password123' as their fixture; #155 then added PasswordPolicy, which rejects exactly that. Neither branch ever saw the other's change, because #155 was cut from main before #154 merged. Both tests now use the same policy-clearing fixture as the rest of the file. The deliberate 'password123' in the rejected-passwords provider stays — that one is the point. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 22:40:51 -03:00
thatguygriff	d554e35d80	Merge pull request 'Validate signup email and password strength' (#155) from feature/150-signup-credential-validation into main ... Reviewed-on: #155	2026-07-30 01:27:05 +00:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	b5b9a7ac54	Validate signup email and password strength ... The password was only ever checked for length. It is now checked on both sides, with each side doing the job it can actually do. The browser scores it with zxcvbn, through WordPress's own password-strength-meter script rather than a second opinion of our own, and refuses to submit below "medium". That is the nuanced test — it knows Tr0ub4dor&3 is weaker than it looks — but it is advice a client can decline to take. Auth\PasswordPolicy runs on the server and is the rule that holds. It does not try to reproduce a strength score in PHP; it rejects the categorically bad, which is what a server can check without shipping a dictionary: too short, a well-known leaked password, fewer than four distinct characters, or the user's own name or email inside it. No composition rules — NIST advises against them, and they mostly produce predictable substitutions. Both thresholds come from the same two constants, handed to JavaScript by wp_localize_script, so the sides cannot drift into disagreeing about what was accepted. The verdict is attached to the field with setCustomValidity() rather than by disabling a button. The form has up to three submits plus a "Next" that already gates on checkValidity(), and an invalid field stops all of them without any of them needing to know why. Email validation moved ahead of the password check, since the password is now checked against the email. A blank form therefore reports the email first, which also matches the order the fields appear in. Verified the browser half against a controllable scorer: each score band blocks or allows as intended, the identity list reaches the meter, and the gate stays open while zxcvbn's dictionary is still loading — the server covers that window. Closes #150 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 22:13:31 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	1d2f95d388	Require a name and birth year for every student ... Both fields are marked in their labels the same way a required registration question is, and enforced on the server whichever form they arrive from: GuardianService::createChild() and updateChild() now refuse a blank name or an unusable birth year, and the signup form checks the same rule up front, before it creates a single user, so a bad block never leaves a half-registered family behind. normaliseBirthYear() became public and static so both paths share one definition of what a usable year is. The signup form cannot lean on the browser here. Its child blocks are hidden until the parent/guardian box is ticked, and a `required` field inside a hidden container makes the whole form unsubmittable with no control the user can reach to fix — the same trap the guardian's own question panel already sidesteps by disabling rather than hiding. So register.js puts `required` on and takes it off along with the block itself, and the server is what makes the rule hold with JavaScript off. The profile screen has no such problem: its forms are always visible, so the attribute is static there. One behaviour change beyond the requirement: a child block with anything typed into it is now reported back instead of dropped. Previously any block without a name was silently discarded, which would now mean losing a birth year the guardian had filled in. A wholly untouched spare block — the one the form always renders for "add another" — is still ignored. Verified the required-toggling in a headless browser: unticked submits, ticked blocks an empty block, a cloned block inherits the requirement, and re-unticking leaves nothing behind to block a non-guardian signup. Closes #148 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 21:00:45 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	7e2bba79fe	Collect a birth year instead of a full date of birth ... Signup and the profile page now ask for a four-digit year between 1900 and the current year. Anything else — a short year, a full date, a year in the future — is discarded rather than stored, so a typo cannot leave a nonsense age on the record. The year lives in a new us_birth_year user meta rather than reusing us_date_of_birth, which would have left one key holding two formats. The old key is not migrated in bulk. Instead GuardianService handles it in two halves: birthYear() falls back to the year of the old date when the new key is absent, so a student added before this change still shows one, and setBirthYear() deletes the old date on every save. That deletion is what makes the fallback safe rather than merely tidy. Without it, clearing the birth year on a student who predates the change would leave the old date behind for the fallback to read straight back, and the year could never be cleared at all. Stored in user meta, so no Schema.php change and no USC_VERSION bump. Closes #147 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 20:47:56 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	76caf178f0	Say "student" and "profile" in the UI, not "child" and "family" ... Sweep the translatable strings across the frontend templates, the admin screens, the editor previews and the block inserter entry. Nothing else moves: the database columns, request parameters, form field names, CSS classes, the us_family shortcode and the us-scheduler/family block name are contracts with existing installs and with post content people have already saved, so renaming them would break sites for no user-visible gain. Two strings are reworded rather than swapped, because the direct substitution reads wrong: - The students list said "Child of Jane" and now says "Managed by Jane". "Student of Jane" would read as a teacher's pupil, which is exactly the wrong idea in a music studio. - A managed account is now "a managed student account" rather than "a student account", which would not distinguish it from the account holder. The guardian feature doc gains a short section on the split, so the next person to work on it does not read the mismatch as drift and "fix" it. Closes #144 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 20:34:55 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	b772e1811e	Let parents register once and book for their children ... A parent registers once and manages lessons for one or more children, who need no login of their own. A child is a real wp_users row with the student role but no usable login — so student_id keeps meaning "a WordPress user" on every table, and booking, credits, policies and enrolments work unchanged. A us_guardians link table maps guardian to child. The signup form gains a parent/guardian tick that reveals a block per child, with the account-signup questions asked per child rather than per guardian — they describe the student, not the account holder. Signup policies are recorded once per child with the guardian as the acceptor, which is the record that actually means something. A family that half-creates is rolled back entirely rather than leaving a guardian who cannot re-register. The booking and enrolment forms gain a "Who is this for?" picker listing children first, so the default selection is never the parent — booking for the wrong child is correctable, quietly billing a parent for their kid's lesson is not. POST /bookings and POST /enrollments take an optional student_id honoured only for that child's guardian; anything else is a 403. That check is the authorisation boundary of the feature. Payments and credits gain a payer: the charge names the child it was for and the guardian who owes it, so per-child reporting is unchanged while notices, receipts and the payment step reach the parent. Credit is held by the payer, so one child's cancellation can settle a sibling's charge, and the daily billing scan sends a guardian one notice covering every child. Closes #132 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-29 16:07:52 -03:00
thatguygriff	7eb2afc6a3	Name the destination page in the continue link ... "Continue to your account" says nothing about where the link goes. Use the chosen page's own title instead — "Continue to Book a Lesson" — so the visitor knows before clicking. An untitled page keeps the generic wording rather than rendering "Continue to ".	2026-07-28 23:06:54 -03:00
thatguygriff	8a985f04d6	Link a signed-in visitor to the configured continue page ... The registration page's already-logged-in branch returned a bare sentence with nowhere to go, leaving the visitor to find their own way to their account. The invited-student branch a few lines above already built exactly the link that was missing. Extract that into continueLink() and use it for both logged-in outcomes. There is deliberately still no wp_login_url() fallback: sending someone already signed in to the login screen is the same dead end with extra steps, so with no page configured there is no link. Both messages now carry the us-register-form wrapper and enqueue the plugin stylesheet, which the invite branch emitted markup for but never loaded. Closes #131	2026-07-28 23:06:54 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	3a954bac57	View a policy version's content, and make policy text readable ... The Policies admin page listed versions but never showed what any of them said, so revising a policy meant retyping it blind into an empty draft box. Each version row now has a View action that renders that version's text on the page, editable in place. A draft is saved back to itself; editing a published or archived version branches a new draft and leaves the original alone, because acceptances are recorded against policy_version_id and text a student agreed to must stay exactly as they saw it. That viewer also exposed why a studio reported the acceptance box as unreadable — one squashed line, overlapping words, a horizontal scrollbar. Bodies are typed into a bare textarea, so most carry no markup, and the raw text was emitted with its blank lines intact but nothing to turn them into paragraphs. PolicyVersion::bodyHtml() now renders every body the way WordPress renders post content (kses, then wpautop) and feeds all three consumers: the booking/enrolment JSON, the signup form, and the new viewer. Bodies written with markup are unaffected. The other half was that .us-policy-body had no CSS whatsoever and inherited whatever the theme did with an unstyled block in a form. It is now a bounded reading box that scrolls vertically and breaks long tokens, so a pasted URL cannot force the page sideways and a long policy cannot push the accept checkbox out of view. RegistrationPage was also never enqueueing the plugin stylesheet, which is why the signup gate looked worst of all. Closes #126 Closes #127 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-28 17:05:00 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 5	13d6b3e14e	Send students to a chosen page when registration succeeds ... The Student Registration block's "After email confirmation" panel becomes "After registration": the page it selects is now where a newly registered student continues to, and a new autoRedirect toggle sends them there instead of showing the link. Only the two finished states qualify (RegistrationPage::isRegistrationComplete): an invited student who is now logged in, and a self-signup back from the emailed confirmation link. A validation error, an expired confirmation link, and the intermediate "check your email" step all stay on the page so their message is read. The invited-student success previously had no link at all; it gains a "Continue to your account" one. That path deliberately has no WordPress-login-screen fallback — pointing someone already signed in at the login screen helps nobody — so continueUrl() distinguishes "no page chosen" from "page chosen", and the redirect does nothing until one is picked. Closes #115 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-28 10:58:17 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 4.8	242150569b	Fix invite sign-in persistence, add invite-only text option, repair account questions ... Three registration fixes reported from live use: - Accepting an invite now keeps the student signed in. The form was processed inside render() during the_content, so wp_set_auth_cookie() ran after headers were sent and the cookie never persisted — the new student was bounced back to the logged-out registration page. The submission is now handled on template_redirect (before output) with a post/redirect/get, so the cookie sticks and the student lands logged in. - The "registration is by invitation only" message is now customisable via a new block attribute (inviteOnlyMessage / shortcode invite_only_message), falling back to the default wording when blank. - Account-registration questions save again. dbDelta does not reliably relax a column from NOT NULL to NULL, so sites created before account- scope questions kept us_questions.offering_id NOT NULL and rejected account inserts ("Column 'offering_id' cannot be null"). A one-time, self-healing migration (guarded by its own option, not the version gate) re-applies the nullable definition on next load. composer test, composer lint, composer cs all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-07-24 16:24:15 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 4.8	a281935811	Add invite-only group classes ... Group classes can now be marked invite-only (us_offerings.access_mode). Invite-only classes are hidden from the public catalog and reachable only when the instructor lets someone in via one of three paths, managed from My Lessons -> My Group Classes: - Add students directly: enrols them now with a pending payment. - Make available: grants registered students access to self-enrol through the normal paid flow (multi-select, emailed a notice). - Invite by email: tokenised registration invite tied to the class for a non-account address; after they register the class becomes enrollable. Reuses an existing pending invite instead of sending a second link. New us_group_access table records grants; GET /offerings merges granted invite-only classes for the caller; enrolment requires a grant (403 invite_required) and flips it to enrolled on success. composer test (487), composer lint, composer cs all pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-07-23 13:51:02 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 4.8	49c59a950c	Add studio-defined account-registration questions ... Studio admins can now define registration questions that every new student answers as a required second step during signup, with each student's answers shown under a "Registration Information" section in the admin. Extends the existing Registration domain: us_questions gains a scope column (offering | account) and a nullable offering_id, and account answers reuse us_question_answers with registration_type = 'account'. Authoring reuses the Offerings -> Questions page via an "Account signup" scope (studio-admin only). The registration form becomes two steps (progressive enhancement via assets/js/register.js; works without JS); required answers are validated before the account is created and apply to all signup paths (invite, group link, self-approval). StudentHistory::registrationInfo() powers the admin section. Bumps the plugin version to 1.1.0 so dbDelta runs the schema migration. Closes #90 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-07-23 09:59:59 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Fable 5	356d9f984d	Add multi-use group invite links with expiry and auto-approval on email confirmation ... A studio admin can generate a shareable group invite link (e.g. for a newsletter) from the Invites page, choosing a required expiry date. Anyone with the link may register while it is valid, in any registration mode: the form collects their own email, they must confirm it via the usual hashed token, and confirming approves the account immediately — group signups never enter the Pending Students queue. - us_invites grows kind (personal/group) and expires_at; an explicit expiry wins over the personal 14-day window. Group links stay pending (multi-use) until revoked or expired. - RegistrationPage: group signups create the account pending with the us_auto_approve marker and send the confirmation email; no auto-login. - EmailConfirmationHandler: auto-approve accounts are approved on confirmation, emailed the approved notice, and redirected to a new us_confirmed=ready notice with a sign-in link. Closes #77 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-22 10:44:16 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Fable 5	681fc5ae07	Lock the registration email to the invite only when the invite is redeemable ... The register form keyed the read-only, prefilled email off any invite row matching the token. A stale token (expired / accepted / revoked) with open registration on therefore showed the stale invite's address read-only while the submit handler took the open branch and required a posted email the locked field never submits, dead-ending the form. The lock now applies exactly when the invite is acceptable; otherwise the editable field renders. Closes #78 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-22 10:24:44 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Fable 5	7b00811133	Show a sign-in link instead of the form after email confirmation ... Closes #67 When a student lands on the registration page from the confirmation email (?us_confirmed=1), replace the registration form with the confirmation message and a "Sign in to your account" link — the form is useless at that point and re-submitting would only produce an "account already exists" error. A confirmed-but-unapproved student can already log in (the pending gate only withholds booking), so signing in is the natural next step. The link target follows the booking block's pattern: a loginPageId block attribute (page picker in the editor sidebar) or login_page_id shortcode attribute, falling back to wp_login_url(). The expired-link notice keeps the form as before. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>	2026-07-18 17:53:38 -03:00
thatguygriffandClaude Opus 4.8	7370755951	Add open student registration with email confirmation and approval ... Students could previously join by invite only. Add an optional self-approval mode, toggled from Studio Settings → Registration: anyone may sign up on the existing [us_student_register] page, confirm their email via a tokenised link, and then be approved by a studio admin before the account is usable. - Enabling the toggle mirrors WordPress's own membership settings (users_can_register + default_role = us_student) and snapshots their previous values so disabling restores them. - WordPress's native registration form is blocked while open registration is on (login_init redirect + registration_errors fail-safe + register_url) so it cannot bypass signup policy acceptance. - Pending accounts: unconfirmed email cannot log in; confirmed but unapproved can log in but the booking capability is withheld and the booking page shows an "awaiting approval" screen. - Approve/reject from Students → Pending Students; reject hard-deletes the account so the email is freed to re-apply. - Invite registration is unchanged; both modes coexist. Account lifecycle lives in user meta (RegistrationStatus); no new tables. Closes #63 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-07-18 10:50:21 -03:00